Scores on benchmarks
Model rank shown below is with respect to all public models..109 |
average_vision
rank 382
81 benchmarks |
|
.173 |
neural_vision
rank 376
38 benchmarks |
|
.349 |
V1
rank 124
24 benchmarks |
|
.307 |
Coggan2024_fMRI.V1-rdm
v1
rank 12
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.558 |
Marques2020
[reference]
rank 324
22 benchmarks |
|
.687 |
V1-orientation
rank 317
7 benchmarks |
|
.986 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-or_selective
v1
rank 79
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.535 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-circular_variance
v1
rank 340
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.553 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-orth_pref_ratio
v1
rank 313
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.700 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-cv_bandwidth_ratio
v1
rank 289
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.983 |
Marques2020_DeValois1982-pref_or
v1
rank 41
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.405 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-opr_cv_diff
v1
rank 336
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.644 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-or_bandwidth
v1
rank 308
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.668 |
V1-spatial_frequency
rank 288
3 benchmarks |
|
.503 |
Marques2020_DeValois1982-peak_sf
v1
rank 309
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.662 |
Marques2020_Schiller1976-sf_bandwidth
v1
[reference]
rank 283
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.839 |
Marques2020_Schiller1976-sf_selective
v1
[reference]
rank 190
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.232 |
V1-response_selectivity
rank 343
4 benchmarks |
|
.209 |
Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-texture_selectivity
v1
[reference]
rank 334
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.199 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-modulation_ratio
v1
rank 331
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.427 |
Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-texture_variance_ratio
v1
[reference]
rank 338
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.094 |
Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-texture_sparseness
v1
[reference]
rank 340
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.528 |
V1-receptive_field_size
rank 212
2 benchmarks |
|
.666 |
Marques2020_Cavanaugh2002-grating_summation_field
v1
[reference]
rank 176
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.390 |
Marques2020_Cavanaugh2002-surround_diameter
v1
[reference]
rank 226
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.363 |
V1-surround_modulation
rank 313
1 benchmark |
|
.363 |
Marques2020_Cavanaugh2002-surround_suppression_index
v1
[reference]
rank 313
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.746 |
V1-texture_modulation
rank 63
2 benchmarks |
|
.807 |
Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-abs_texture_modulation_index
v1
[reference]
rank 52
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.684 |
Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-texture_modulation_index
v1
[reference]
rank 217
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.682 |
V1-response_magnitude
rank 313
3 benchmarks |
|
.653 |
Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-max_texture
v1
[reference]
rank 311
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.689 |
Marques2020_Ringach2002-max_dc
v1
rank 333
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.705 |
Marques2020_FreemanZiemba2013-max_noise
v1
[reference]
rank 271
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.183 |
FreemanZiemba2013.V1-pls
v2
[reference]
rank 413
|
|
recordings from
102
sites in
V1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.180 |
V2
rank 105
2 benchmarks |
|
.097 |
Coggan2024_fMRI.V2-rdm
v1
rank 72
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.263 |
FreemanZiemba2013.V2-pls
v2
[reference]
rank 322
|
|
recordings from
103
sites in
V2
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.108 |
V4
rank 394
5 benchmarks |
|
.053 |
Coggan2024_fMRI.V4-rdm
v1
rank 66
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.224 |
SanghaviJozwik2020.V4-pls
v1
[reference]
rank 372
|
|
recordings from
50
sites in
V4
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.083 |
SanghaviMurty2020.V4-pls
v1
[reference]
rank 376
|
|
recordings from
46
sites in
V4
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.179 |
MajajHong2015.V4-pls
v3
[reference]
rank 419
|
|
recordings from
88
sites in
V4
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.053 |
IT
rank 422
7 benchmarks |
|
-0.007 |
Bracci2019.anteriorVTC-rdm
v1
rank 445
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.254 |
Coggan2024_fMRI.IT-rdm
v1
rank 107
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.122 |
MajajHong2015.IT-pls
v3
[reference]
rank 420
|
|
recordings from
168
sites in
IT
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.045 |
behavior_vision
rank 362
43 benchmarks |
|
.198 |
Ferguson2024
[reference]
rank 205
14 benchmarks |
|
.517 |
Ferguson2024half-value_delta
v1
[reference]
rank 106
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.437 |
Ferguson2024gray_hard-value_delta
v1
[reference]
rank 99
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.509 |
Ferguson2024round_v-value_delta
v1
[reference]
rank 104
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.317 |
Ferguson2024convergence-value_delta
v1
[reference]
rank 123
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.346 |
Ferguson2024round_f-value_delta
v1
[reference]
rank 99
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.138 |
Ferguson2024gray_easy-value_delta
v1
[reference]
rank 146
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.507 |
Ferguson2024tilted_line-value_delta
v1
[reference]
rank 128
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.022 |
Hebart2023-match
v1
rank 213
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.142 |
Coggan2024_behavior-ConditionWiseAccuracySimilarity
v1
rank 137
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
How to use
from brainscore_vision import load_model model = load_model("hmax") model.start_task(...) model.start_recording(...) model.look_at(...)
Benchmarks bibtex
@inproceedings{santurkar2019computer, title={Computer Vision with a Single (Robust) Classifier}, author={Shibani Santurkar and Dimitris Tsipras and Brandon Tran and Andrew Ilyas and Logan Engstrom and Aleksander Madry}, booktitle={ArXiv preprint arXiv:1906.09453}, year={2019} } @article {Marques2021.03.01.433495, author = {Marques, Tiago and Schrimpf, Martin and DiCarlo, James J.}, title = {Multi-scale hierarchical neural network models that bridge from single neurons in the primate primary visual cortex to object recognition behavior}, elocation-id = {2021.03.01.433495}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.03.01.433495}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory}, abstract = {Primate visual object recognition relies on the representations in cortical areas at the top of the ventral stream that are computed by a complex, hierarchical network of neural populations. While recent work has created reasonably accurate image-computable hierarchical neural network models of those neural stages, those models do not yet bridge between the properties of individual neurons and the overall emergent behavior of the ventral stream. One reason we cannot yet do this is that individual artificial neurons in multi-stage models have not been shown to be functionally similar to individual biological neurons. Here, we took an important first step by building and evaluating hundreds of hierarchical neural network models in how well their artificial single neurons approximate macaque primary visual cortical (V1) neurons. We found that single neurons in certain models are surprisingly similar to their biological counterparts and that the distributions of single neuron properties, such as those related to orientation and spatial frequency tuning, approximately match those in macaque V1. Critically, we observed that hierarchical models with V1 stages that better match macaque V1 at the single neuron level are also more aligned with human object recognition behavior. Finally, we show that an optimized classical neuroscientific model of V1 is more functionally similar to primate V1 than all of the tested multi-stage models, suggesting room for further model improvements with tangible payoffs in closer alignment to human behavior. These results provide the first multi-stage, multi-scale models that allow our field to ask precisely how the specific properties of individual V1 neurons relate to recognition behavior.HighlightsImage-computable hierarchical neural network models can be naturally extended to create hierarchical {\textquotedblleft}brain models{\textquotedblright} that allow direct comparison with biological neural networks at multiple scales {\textendash} from single neurons, to population of neurons, to behavior.Single neurons in some of these hierarchical brain models are functionally similar to single neurons in macaque primate visual cortex (V1)Some hierarchical brain models have processing stages in which the entire distribution of artificial neuron properties closely matches the biological distributions of those same properties in macaque V1Hierarchical brain models whose V1 processing stages better match the macaque V1 stage also tend to be more aligned with human object recognition behavior at their output stageCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.}, URL = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/13/2021.03.01.433495}, eprint = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/13/2021.03.01.433495.full.pdf}, journal = {bioRxiv} } @article{Schiller1976, author = {Schiller, P. H. and Finlay, B. L. and Volman, S. F.}, doi = {10.1152/jn.1976.39.6.1352}, issn = {0022-3077}, journal = {Journal of neurophysiology}, number = {6}, pages = {1334--1351}, pmid = {825624}, title = {{Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. III. Spatial Frequency}}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/825624}, volume = {39}, year = {1976} } @article{Freeman2013, author = {Freeman, Jeremy and Ziemba, Corey M. and Heeger, David J. and Simoncelli, E. P. and Movshon, J. A.}, doi = {10.1038/nn.3402}, issn = {10976256}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, number = {7}, pages = {974--981}, pmid = {23685719}, publisher = {Nature Publishing Group}, title = {{A functional and perceptual signature of the second visual area in primates}}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3402}, volume = {16}, year = {2013} } @article{Cavanaugh2002, author = {Cavanaugh, James R. and Bair, Wyeth and Movshon, J. A.}, doi = {10.1152/jn.00692.2001}, isbn = {0022-3077 (Print) 0022-3077 (Linking)}, issn = {0022-3077}, journal = {Journal of Neurophysiology}, mendeley-groups = {Benchmark effects/Done,Benchmark effects/*Surround Suppression}, number = {5}, pages = {2530--2546}, pmid = {12424292}, title = {{Nature and Interaction of Signals From the Receptive Field Center and Surround in Macaque V1 Neurons}}, url = {http://www.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/jn.00692.2001}, volume = {88}, year = {2002} } @Article{Freeman2013, author={Freeman, Jeremy and Ziemba, Corey M. and Heeger, David J. and Simoncelli, Eero P. and Movshon, J. Anthony}, title={A functional and perceptual signature of the second visual area in primates}, journal={Nature Neuroscience}, year={2013}, month={Jul}, day={01}, volume={16}, number={7}, pages={974-981}, abstract={The authors examined neuronal responses in V1 and V2 to synthetic texture stimuli that replicate higher-order statistical dependencies found in natural images. V2, but not V1, responded differentially to these textures, in both macaque (single neurons) and human (fMRI). Human detection of naturalistic structure in the same images was predicted by V2 responses, suggesting a role for V2 in representing natural image structure.}, issn={1546-1726}, doi={10.1038/nn.3402}, url={https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3402} } @misc{Sanghavi_Jozwik_DiCarlo_2021, title={SanghaviJozwik2020}, url={osf.io/fhy36}, DOI={10.17605/OSF.IO/FHY36}, publisher={OSF}, author={Sanghavi, Sachi and Jozwik, Kamila M and DiCarlo, James J}, year={2021}, month={Nov} } @misc{Sanghavi_Murty_DiCarlo_2021, title={SanghaviMurty2020}, url={osf.io/fchme}, DOI={10.17605/OSF.IO/FCHME}, publisher={OSF}, author={Sanghavi, Sachi and Murty, N A R and DiCarlo, James J}, year={2021}, month={Nov} } @article {Majaj13402, author = {Majaj, Najib J. and Hong, Ha and Solomon, Ethan A. and DiCarlo, James J.}, title = {Simple Learned Weighted Sums of Inferior Temporal Neuronal Firing Rates Accurately Predict Human Core Object Recognition Performance}, volume = {35}, number = {39}, pages = {13402--13418}, year = {2015}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5181-14.2015}, publisher = {Society for Neuroscience}, abstract = {To go beyond qualitative models of the biological substrate of object recognition, we ask: can a single ventral stream neuronal linking hypothesis quantitatively account for core object recognition performance over a broad range of tasks? We measured human performance in 64 object recognition tests using thousands of challenging images that explore shape similarity and identity preserving object variation. We then used multielectrode arrays to measure neuronal population responses to those same images in visual areas V4 and inferior temporal (IT) cortex of monkeys and simulated V1 population responses. We tested leading candidate linking hypotheses and control hypotheses, each postulating how ventral stream neuronal responses underlie object recognition behavior. Specifically, for each hypothesis, we computed the predicted performance on the 64 tests and compared it with the measured pattern of human performance. All tested hypotheses based on low- and mid-level visually evoked activity (pixels, V1, and V4) were very poor predictors of the human behavioral pattern. However, simple learned weighted sums of distributed average IT firing rates exactly predicted the behavioral pattern. More elaborate linking hypotheses relying on IT trial-by-trial correlational structure, finer IT temporal codes, or ones that strictly respect the known spatial substructures of IT ({ extquotedblleft}face patches{ extquotedblright}) did not improve predictive power. Although these results do not reject those more elaborate hypotheses, they suggest a simple, sufficient quantitative model: each object recognition task is learned from the spatially distributed mean firing rates (100 ms) of \~{}60,000 IT neurons and is executed as a simple weighted sum of those firing rates.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We sought to go beyond qualitative models of visual object recognition and determine whether a single neuronal linking hypothesis can quantitatively account for core object recognition behavior. To achieve this, we designed a database of images for evaluating object recognition performance. We used multielectrode arrays to characterize hundreds of neurons in the visual ventral stream of nonhuman primates and measured the object recognition performance of \>100 human observers. Remarkably, we found that simple learned weighted sums of firing rates of neurons in monkey inferior temporal (IT) cortex accurately predicted human performance. Although previous work led us to expect that IT would outperform V4, we were surprised by the quantitative precision with which simple IT-based linking hypotheses accounted for human behavior.}, issn = {0270-6474}, URL = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402}, eprint = {https://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/39/13402.full.pdf}, journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}} @misc{ferguson_ngo_lee_dicarlo_schrimpf_2024, title={How Well is Visual Search Asymmetry predicted by a Binary-Choice, Rapid, Accuracy-based Visual-search, Oddball-detection (BRAVO) task?}, url={osf.io/5ba3n}, DOI={10.17605/OSF.IO/5BA3N}, publisher={OSF}, author={Ferguson, Michael E, Jr and Ngo, Jerry and Lee, Michael and DiCarlo, James and Schrimpf, Martin}, year={2024}, month={Jun} }